About A Man & His Idea

Roses on Wall25 years ago I met Phil Crowley when his struggling public company, Southern Kitchens, was introduced to me by two of the initial investors (they thought I might be able to help save the company).

Phil started out as a man with a vision of making money and doing good, and he pushed harder and harder until it became reality.  He wanted to employ people that had strikes against them and found it difficult to find good jobs.  He knew that men without meaningful work had a hard time showing their families what a good life would look like.

The Company manufactured packaged food products for the vending industry and went from just an idea and zero sales to about five million in sales, about fifty ex-offenders working at the plant, and a few hundred investor/shareholders over ten years because of Phil’s persistence and passion.

Most of Phil’s workers never had a good job before.  Those men taught me lessons in respect and how good work is valued.

Phil was not a dreamer, he handled theft and the problems common to the people he worked with.  For six months I watched Phil run a difficult business and observed the pride and dedication of a work force of men (mostly) that had never had a good job before.

Phil did not get a chance to see his vision become the new national model of capitalism and not because his vision was flawed or that it could not have worked.

He paid a good wage, the work was clean, and the hope of workers owning publicly traded stock would build wealth beyond just the weekly paycheck.

The essence of his vision could revolutionize jobs in the inner city and make life better for so many people, workers and their families and revitalize hundreds of American communities.

What happened to Southern Kitchens we read about today all too often; events outside of Phil’s control put the company into a stressful situation that demanded a partnership or buyout.

The Southern Kitchens French Accent partnership was very poorly chosen (think Bernie Madoff) and the company was soon run into the ground by the French Accent management (who went to jail) and all the people that so needed their jobs lost their jobs and the company collapsed.  Phil’s right hand man killed himself – he had built his life around this company as had Phil.  Phil died a few years ago, I think of a broken heart.

It would not hurt us to revisit Phil Crowley’s new model of capitalism.

Resolutions Are Hard, Change Is Easier

img_0550Most New Years Resolutions don’t stick. Work on change. It is a process with a greater chance of success. Accomplishing a single positive change will make you feel better (a whole lot better than the vast majority of people that don’t keep their New Years resolution).

Best wishes for a terrific new year and a successful positive change in your life.

Reducing Risk in Acquisition; Building The Best Team

It takes no special talent to find companies to look at, make offers, arrange finance, & close deals. Any good broker can fill your plate with attractive companies to review.

This explains why most deals don’t add value.

Deals that add value are those that were well defined and researched on the front end by smart people using high value process and followed up with good negotiating, due diligence, and integration teams.

A failure in any of these areas has the potential of making a giant mistake. Half of all non-financial business failures were private equity owned last year.

Even the people that should know how to make acquisitions are making big mistakes.

Even the best team can still make mistakes, but far fewer and much smaller.

More On Reducing Risk

Share your stories and comments

Defining Acquisition Risk, by Mike Tikkanen

According to Interim CEO, 71% of their placed executives have completed less than three acquisitions when they are hired for that purpose. This partially explains why between 53% & 61% of transactions destroy value & only 17% create substantial returns From Planning to execution to integration, acquisitions are complex.

The finely tuned watch comparison is an appropriate analogy. Any misaligned piece causes the watch to run badly, and while there are many people capable of dismantling the watch, few can put it together.

Repeatedly, I see teams of smart people with pieces of the skill set required to understake the acquisition process, only to observe disastrous consequences of an obvious mistake blowing a hole in the transaction (or worse yet, forcing a poorly chosen transaction to be completed).

Much of the candidate criteria determination, auditing, and integration is non linear. It’s surprising to see how much attention is paid to numbers, and how little to people, systems, relationships, and networks.

Mapping an acquisition is too much for this blog, but to state the wisdom of including a plan for non financial audit and integration at the time of profiling and research would guarantee an understanding of process and a good chance that missing gaping misfits in people and systems would less likely ruin your deal.

Risk Considerations: Continue reading “Defining Acquisition Risk, by Mike Tikkanen”

When Finance Is Not An Answer

When all you have is a hammer

A recent phone call proved to be another painful exchange with a hammer toting consultant that could not see value in spending time on any effort other than raising money for his venture.

No matter that the banks are cold, he’s had no luck with presentations to non bank lenders & equity groups, and his client is on the path to extinction if an answer does not present itself soon.

After several attempts at explaining how money comes easier to deals that have the important pieces in place, I found myself throwing in the towel earlier than I used to.

I could feel how firmly the blinders were glued to this man’s head.

It was as if I was trying teach a pig to sing (wasting my time and annoying the pig).

What needed to be understood was, the reason his project was so hard to fund was that parts of it were not far enough along, safe enough, (management, etc) or it just needed to have something not currently present. Money comes to deals that have the necessary pieces in place.

Each struggling venture has one or more part/s that need to be bought, fixed, or found.

Allowing a search for a strategic partner, joint venture, or acquisition target, one gets to pick between money offered at reasonable or unreasonable terms, and another set of alternatives that may or may not be more attractive than a straight play for money.

In business as in life, having choices is better than not having choices.

Have something to add? Your own business wit?

Got a different point of view, want to play devil’s advocate, or just think we’re all wet? Post your experiences or examples.

Death By Acquisition

bestpic-2-of-bridge-collapseDeath by Acquisition


Not knowing where the rocks are drowns many acquisition teams.  

Executing any step poorly increases the risk of failure.  

1.   Knowing what to look for and how to investigate target candidates is a process that needs to be made measurable.

A robust assumption challanging corporate exercise to determine the most important and least important attributes is critical piece of any acquisition.   This process should  include definable/measurable risk management questions, and core corporate strategies.

2.   A system for affordable mass contact and information gathering and data management insures a more useful information system and a higher number of qualified candidates with a higher measure of success.  Not knowing how to do this dooms us to the stone age practice of calling brokers and combing the yellow pages.

A recent client had investigated over one hundred poorly identified companies over four years with one small success.  Another company investigated fewer candidates, but they spent years pursuing companies located all over the world, with attendant costs, and no success.  Executive pay, travel, due diligence have been in the millions of dollars.

Fortunately neither company succumbed to the pressure of making a bad purchase (a very common problem), for that would have cost them many times more.

3.    Being smart in valuation in these difficult times demands having a finger on the pulse and the ability to make and defend the right offer.  This is no easy task without being tied in to professional organisation that monitors this information.  We are prone to hip shoot this process.  

Included in valuation is the snapshot integration financial and nonfinancial assumptions that must be predicted based on limited information that will be useful only if the process for information gathering is disciplined.  Without an accurate view of the combined entities, all valuations are at risk.

My experience points to extreme optimism about upside valuation and integration.

4.   Negotiation/deal structure/finance is of course the core of a deal.  Personalities, deal structure, math, and assumptions are either all right, or they are all wrong.  Any doubt in this area and now is the time to stop.  If the first three steps were executed wisely and well, this step is much easier.

5.  Acquisition integration chaos is more accurate terminology in many companies.  From CRM, HR, to the operations, integration professonals can save relationships, efficiencies, and businesses.  So often corporate branding, technology, and culture are shocked and damaged through an unprofessional, or inadequate approach brought in with the acquiring firm.  Valuations are negatively affected and it takes years to right the wrongs that occurred in a poorly executed integration.  

Only rarely have I seen mid market companies execute this step with any finesse or professionalism.  http://www.tx2systems.com/  can be helpful.

There are many distinct pieces to acquisition.  Companies that understand the process do well consistently.   Companies that fail to grasp the comlexities and learn the disciplines, seldom attempt a second acquisition.

Mike Tikkanen





Have something to add? 
Got a different point of view, want to play devil’s advocate, or just think we’re all wet? Post your experiences or examples.

Value Insights



What We Know That Just jimearlyphotoAin’t So, or

Value Insights



Unanticipated mundane external factors are most often responsible for dumping our transactions into the 80% that don’t add value category. 


Carefully developed evaluation and due diligence models offer the best chance of uncovering the questions that if answered properly, will cause us to avoid the failures that affect the great majority of acquiring companies.


To have great evaluation and due diligence models without a strong team that can recognize, develop, and work with the tools will drop you short of your goals also.



The assumptions made in the board room about the talents, team members, roles, responsibilities, systems, and procedures, determines the accuracy of the search and the effectiveness of the due diligence. 


A smart team with the right resources can execute the complex task of acquisition at a far lower risk factor than a half smart team with almost the right resources.  The losses can be staggering.  The investments in team and resources are quite modest in comparison.



Have something to add? 
Got a different point of view, want to play devil’s advocate, or just think we’re all wet? Post your experiences or examples.


Brought to you by;                                         www.packardacquisitions.com

Key Man Insurance


Key Man Insurance


The deal was almost done.  The owner was asked if he has prepared his key man for the transaction.  Specifically, he was asked if he had promised the key man a bonus for sticking around for 12 months to make sure that the new corporate owners would transition well into the client base and management team. 


This was a rich deal for the owner.  The owner assured us that he had generously compensated his key man.


Days before the transaction was to close the key man quit and moved across the street to another plating company.  The owner had thought our concerns overblown and had in fact done nothing to incentivize his key man. 


This deal fell out of bed with a non retrievable thump.


Tightness of wallet cost this seller millions of dollars (and nearly a heart attack) when his deal collapsed when the key man left.


In trying to patch up the transaction and talking with the key man, I discovered that he would have been happy with a small amount of money and a little more title but he was felt damaged by being treated like part of the woodwork.   Due diligence is more than validating the numbers. 

Have something to add? 
Got a different point of view, want to play devil’s advocate, or just think we’re all wet? Post your experiences or examples.                                                                                                                                                                                 Brought to you by;                                         www.packardacquisitions.com

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑


Acquisition, the inside story

Pacquisitions's Blog

Acquisition, the inside story

Dan Stewart Media

Promote. Express. Create.


WordPress.com is the best place for your personal blog or business site.

The Changing World of Employment

The blog presence of Vallon, LLC and our friends!

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.